Want to see chained dogs get some relief?
Is it legal in your community to abandon dogs to the backyard in both plummeting, winter temperatures and sweltering, summer heat?
Why not step up to see a tethering ordinance passed in your city?
Two, huge paws up!
Two, huge paws up to the many, proactive, Ohio communities that have already passed common sense legislation! Tethering ordinances exist in more than thirty-six, Ohio jurisdictions and more than twenty states.
Most of the Ohio ordinances are based on the Cleveland ordinance, linked here.
Three jurisdictions in Hamilton County, where I live, have tethering laws. The Cincinnati, tethering ordinance is enforced by the Cincinnati Police Department.
Columbia and Anderson Townships both have tethering resolutions, enforced by the Hamilton County Sheriff.
IMPORTANT – The SPCA Cincinnati does not enforce the tethering laws. SPCA enforces state law. There is no mention of “tethering” in Ohio law. So, do not call the SPCA about a chained or tethered dog.
Common, tethering ordinances do not allow the animal to be tied outside in extreme weather, between 10 PM – 6 AM, and when the owner is not home.
Please note that Ohio counties cannot pass a tethering ordinance. Each jurisdiction within the county must pass the ordinance on its own.
Promoting Public Safety
Tethering ordinances are good for both our animals and our communities. They are common sense requirements for the endlessly tethered dogs, who lead lives of frustration, loneliness, and boredom. Tying the animals without relief encourages the dogs to be defensive of their small territory.
The ordinances also promote safeguards for people, particularly children, who may wander into the dog’s area and encounter a dog poised to defend his small space. CDC reports that a tethered dog is 3 times more likely to bite. Children under 12 are 5 times more likely to be bitten by a dog.
Animal cruelty is powerfully connected to interpersonal violence and some, untreated, mental illness. The animal abuse and extreme neglect can be a red flag that others in the area (children, elders, partners) are also in danger.
Contributing to Quality of Life
Tethered dogs are often the source of community nuisance. They bark, howl, and whine continuously in their neighborhoods. Needless tension and ongoing conflicts arise among neighbors over those annoying cries at all hours.
Yards and city lots with scruffy dogs tied to a stake, that often use old, worn out cars or rusted barrels as their shelter, are unsightly. They add to urban blight.
Encouraging Humane Treatment of Animals
Dogs suffer physically and psychologically. Endlessly tethering a dog out back, with no social interaction, with no relief from habitual pacing in a small area, with no protection from extreme weather – is unconscionable.
Dogs on tethers can be injured or killed. They get tangled around a tree, a pole, or a bush. They can hang themselves on a fence. Their collars can become too tight or embedded in their necks.
Our laws should reflect our community values. Cincinnati, where I live, is a place where people care about their next-door neighbors – human and canine – and their fifty-two neighborhoods. They want to live in healthy, vibrant, and top-notch communities, where families and their animals are safe, respected, and well-treated.
WHAT YOU CAN DO:
Copy the Cleveland and Columbus ordinances, linked above. Read and share them with friends, who will go with you to talk to your mayor or trustee.
Call you mayor or trustee to make an appointment to talk to him about how a tethering ordinance can be passed where YOU live.
E-mail him links to the Cleveland and Columbus ordinances so he will have sample legislation to work from.
Don’t be nervous about talking to your mayor. He will not expect you to be an animal law attorney. He knows just what to do to get such an ordinance passed. Once he agrees that a tethering ordinance is a good idea, he will carry it forward for you.
Need help? PM me, Beth Sheehan, or J.D. Cooke on FB.
Check out Jason’s FB page, Unchain Ohio, at the link.
Let’s unchain outside dogs!
Get political for Ohio cats, dogs, and people at risk!
Follow Paws and the Law to be an informed advocate.
Thank you for doing what you can, where you are, for our beloved cats and dogs.
Here are the main points of and links to current, Ohio, companion animal bills. Most are necessary bills that not only aim to protect our beloved cats and dogs, but they also will safeguard our state’s most vulnerable populations, elderly, children, handicapped, and partners.
There are one hundred thirty-two state senators and state representatives. They vote on our bills. Each Ohio voter can vote for only one state representative and one state senator, based on where he lives.
Make certain you know who your state rep and state senator are. You will want to be in contact with those two legislators in support of or opposed to these bills.
Find your state representative and state senator
Your two most important state legislators are your own state rep and state senator. (Senators Brown and Portman are US congressional senators.)
https://www.legislature.ohio.gov/ (Locate your state rep and your state senator here by typing in your zip code PLUS four digit extension in the two boxes next to “Find my legislators”. Questions? PM Beth Sheehan)
Bills in the 131st General Assembly
1. HB 45, Humane Officer Training – SUPPORT
Introduced – February 10, 2015
Assigned to Local Government Committee – February 11, 2015
Cosponsors: Representatives Jack Cera, Michael Stinziano, Debbie Phillips, Sean O’Brien, Cheryl Grossman, Michele Lepore-Hagan
(HB 45 IS IMPORTANT. The humane officer has 20 hours of special training in how to approach and to analyze an animal crime scene.
Additionally, HB 45 gets rid of the residency requirement. Right now a humane officer can only work in the county in which he lives. By getting rid of the residency requirement, the same amount of officers can spread out to additional counties to investigate animal cruelty.
Finally, many, Ohio counties, especially rural ones, have no humane officer right now.)
https://www.legislature.ohio.gov/legislation/legislation-summary?id=GA131-HB-45 (Read HB 45 here.)
2. HB 60, ‘Goddard’s Law’ – enacted into Ohio law
Sponsors: Representatives Bill Patmon and Dave Hall
Cosponsors: Representatives Nickie J. Antonio, John Barnes, Jr., Louis W. Blessing III, Janine R. Boyd, Tim W. Brown, Jack Cera, Cheryl L. Grossman, Sarah LaTourette, David Leland, Michele Lepore-Hagan, John Patterson, Debbie Phillips, Mark J. Romanchuk, Michael Sheehy, Marilyn Slaby, Margaret Ann Ruhl, Marlene Anielski, Mike Ashford, Nan A. Baker, Nicholas J. Celebrezze, Mike Dovilla, Denise Driehaus, Teresa Fedor, Bob D. Hackett, Stephen D. Hambley, Michael Henne, Stephanie D. Howse, Greta Johnson, Terry Johnson, Michael J. O’Brien, Sean O’Brien, Dorothy Pelanda, Dan Ramos, John M. Rogers, Kirk Schuring, Barbara Sears, Stephen Slesnick, Kent Smith, Martin J. Sweeney
(HB 60 IN ITS ORIGINAL FORM was important. “Goddard’s Law”, felony for animal cruelty, is the next step for Ohio after “Nitro’s Law”. Let’s look at felony for animal abuse in Ohio right now. MOST animal abuse is a misdemeanor in Ohio. There are two, specific times when animal abuse is a felony. First, the SECOND TIME that an offender is convicted of animal cruelty, it is a felony. The first time that offender is convicted it is a misdemeanor. Second, if an animal “in the care of a kennel” is intentionally harmed by the manager, the owner, or the employees, it is a felony. This is “Nitro’s Law”.
Additionally, Ohio judges are mandated to seek community sanctions (no jail) for certain nonviolent offenders because of prison overcrowding. Animal abusers are considered by law to be nonviolent.
So, the animal abusers often end up with no jail time, a fine, AND they get their animal back.
This bill, when it was in the 130th General Assembly, was very much stronger. HB 60 WITH THE AMENDMENT seriously dilutes the bill and does not adequately protect our cats and dogs.)
(Read HB 60 here.)
3. HB 94, Cruelty, Neglect, and Tethering – SUPPORT
Introduced – March 2, 2015
Assigned – March 4, 2015 to Agriculture and Rural Development
Sponsor: Representative John Barnes Jr.
Cosponsors: Representatives Mike Duffey, Michele Lepore-Hagan, and Margaret Ann Ruhl
(HB 94 IS IMPORTANT. It aims to curb animal cruelty, neglect, and endless tethering. Owners are neither permitted to tether their animals outside when there are weather advisories nor when the owner is not home.
There is specification for appropriate shelter. So, the plastic igloo at twenty degrees below zero and the deck twenty feet away from the dog in ninety-five degrees is not “adequate shelter”. )
(Read HB 94 here.)
4. HB 121, Service Dog Awareness Week – Support
Introduced – March 12, 2015
Passed House – 93 – 0 – May 13, 2015; Passed Senate – 33 – 0
HB 121 is on its way to the governor’s desk.
Sponsors: Representatives Michael Stinziano and Margaret Ann Ruhl
Cosponsors: Representatives Ron Amstutz, Nicholas J. Celebrezze, Michele Lepore-Hagan, Debbie Phillips, Jeffery S. Rezabek, Cheryl L. Grossman, Bob D. Hackett, Stephen Slesnick, Martin J. Sweeney, Sarah LaTourette, Nickie J. Antonio, Nan A. Baker, Andrew Brenner, Thomas E. Brinkman, Jr., Tim W. Brown, Jim Buchy, Hearcel F. Craig, Robert R. Cupp, Timothy Derickson, Denise Driehaus, Teresa Fedor, Timothy E. Ginter, Christina Hagan, David Hall, Stephen D. Hambley, Brian Hill, Greta Johnson, Terry Johnson, Christie Bryant Kuhns, Stephanie Kunze, Al Landis, David Leland, Michael J. O’Brien, Sean O’Brien, Rick Perales, Dan Ramos, John M. Rogers, Mark J. Romanchuk, Tim Schaffer, Barbara R. Sears, Michael Sheehy, Marilyn Slaby, Kent Smith, Robert Sprague, Emilia Strong Sykes, Ron Young, Senators Bill Beagle, Charleta B. Tavares, Edna Brown
(HB 121 IS IMPORTANT because it educates the public about the unique skills that a service animal has that allow his owner to be more independent in his life. It also informs business owners of the rights the service animal owner and service animal have while in the store, movie, or restaurant.)
(Read HB 121 here.)
5. HB 187, First Responders May Stabilize Pets in Emergencies – goes into effect September 12, 2016
Sponsor: Representative Timothy Ginter
Cosponsors: Representatives LaTourette, Blessing III, Schaffer, Vitale, Michelle Lepore-Hagan, Margaret Ruhl, Becker, Hambley
(HB 187 IS IMPORTANT – It clearly defines what first responders may do on behalf of our pets if they are in a crisis, like a fire or a car accident. They can provide oxygen with a ventilator or mouth to snout to a stressed animal or a splint to his injured leg before the animal goes to a veterinarian.)
(Read HB 187 here.)
6. HB 198, Special Prosecutors Appointed by Humane Societies – OPPOSE
Introduced – May 11, 2015
Assigned to Judiciary Committee – May 19, 2015
Sponsor: Representatives Stephen Hambley and Greta Johnson
Cosponsors: Representatives Heather Bishoff, Terry Boose, Bob D. Hackett, Brian Hill, Doug Green, Michael J. O’Brien
(IT IS IMPORTANT TO OPPOSE HB 198 because it limits the choices a humane society has in prosecuting animal cruelty. Additionally, it may have encourage humane societies to prosecute animal abuse crimes as misdemeanors instead of felonies.)
(Read HB 198 here.)
7. HB 267, “Trooper’s Bill” – SUPPORT
Sponsor: Representative Margaret Ruhl
Cosponsors: Representatives Andrew Brenner, Teresa Fedor, Cheryl Grossman, Sarah LaTourette, Michele Lepore-Hagan, Andy Thompson
(This bill aims to establish a deer sanctuary license to allow a licensee to raise deer, to establish requirements governing such a license, to require the Chief of the Division of Wildlife to issue a wild animal permit to allow a permit holder to rehabilitate deer, to establish procedures that certain law enforcement officers must follow when responding to accidents involving injured or deceased deer, and to require training for those officers regarding humane procedures for euthanizing injured deer.)
(Read HB 267 here.)
8. HB 447, “Killing Police Dogs in the Line of Duty” – SUPPORT
Sponsors: Representatives Schuring and Slesnick
Summary – “to increase penalties for intentionally killing police canines in the line of duty”
Status – State Government Committee
(Read HB 447 here.)
9. SB 151, “The Klonda Richey Act” – INTERESTED
SPONSOR: Senator Bill Beagle
Cosponsor: Senator Peggy Lehner
Introduced – April 27, 2015
Assigned to Agriculture Committee – April 29, 2015; had hearing in the Senate Agriculture Committee on April 26, 2016
(This bill aims to give clarity to “nuisance, dangerous, and vicious dogs”, to revise enforcement of that Law, and to establish a notification process regarding complaints of certain violations of that Law.)
(Read SB 151 here.)
10. SB 195 – Prohibiting Sexual Contact with Animals – SUPPORT
Introduced – July 16, 2015
Assigned to Criminal Justice Committee – September 17, 2015
Sponsors: Senators Jim Hughes and Jay Hottinger
(SB 195 IS IMPORTANT because having sexual contact with an animal is legal in Ohio. This bill makes it a misdemeanor to have sexual contact with an animal. It allows for the seizure and impoundment of the animal that is violated. Also, it authorizes the court to require an offender to undergo psychological evaluation or counseling.)
(Read SB 195 here.)
11. SB 215 – Good Samaritan – goes into effect on August 31, 2016
Sponsors: Senators Jim Hughes and Frank LaRose
Cosponsors: Senators Kevin Bacon and Joe Uecker
(SB 215 is an important bill because it allows individuals to rescue pets and children in danger in unattended vehicles with immunity from civil liability.)
(Read SB 215 here.)
12. SB 271 – Police Buys Dog or Horse – SUPPORT
Sponsor: Senator Lou Gentile
Cosponsors: Senators Kenny Yuko, Shannon Jones, Joe Schiavoni, Capri S. Cafaro, Michael Skindell, Charleta B. Tavares, Cecil Thomas, Frank LaRose
(SB 271 is an important bill that aims to allow a police officer to buy a his police dog or horse at fair market value at retirement.)
(Read SB 271 here.)
13. SB 286 – Killing a Police Dog or Horse – SUPPORT
Introduced – February 29, 2016
Assigned to Senate Criminal Justice Committee – April 12, 2016
Sponsor: Senator Jim Hughes
(SB 286 is important because it increases penalty for assaulting a police dog or horse. It requires, if the dog or horse is killed, a mandatory prison term and a mandatory fine to be paid to the law enforcement agency served by the dog or horse.)