HB 278 Weakens the Effective Prosecution of Ohio Animal Cruelty
Opposition testimony is being heard in Columbus for HB 278, “Special Prosecutors”, on Tuesday, February 23, 2016. I strongly encourage you to write to the leadership of the House Government Accountability and Oversight Committee in opposition to this bill.
You may use any part of my blog that you like. It is always better if you vary it so that all of the letters do not sound the same.
Links to both the bill and its analysis follow the blog.
House Government Accountability and Oversight
Rep Tim W. Brown, chair email@example.com (614) 466-8104
Rep Louis W. Blessing, vice chair firstname.lastname@example.org (614) 466-9091
Rep Kathleen Clyde, ranking minority member email@example.com (614) 466-2004
HB 278 Has Shut its Eyes to Rampant Violence
I oppose the passage of HB 278, “Special Prosecutors”, sponsored by Representative Stephen Hambley. Animal cruelty, a gateway act to human violence, must be prosecuted with great vigor in order to effectively safeguard our communities.
The animal crime is often the most visible sign in the area that others too (children, elderly, handicapped, partners) may also be in danger of unmitigated violence or extreme neglect.
The county humane society is in the best position right now to properly choose between the special prosecutor and the county prosecutor. HB 278 takes away that choice.
What happens when the already overworked, county prosecutor – with no training in animal law – gets an animal crime case with no potential for a large settlement? That case quickly moves to the bottom of his stack. It may never soon see the light of day.
In the meantime, the seized animals are on hold in the local humane society. That humane society is providing the daily cost of care, veterinary care, behavior assessment, and rehabilitation training. Those costs become staggering with many, confiscated animals, detained over a long time. That weighty, financial burden can potentially cause a humane society to fail.
Also, each day dogs and cats are impounded, adds a risk to the well-being of the animal victims. Additionally, the animals in custody are taking space, resources, and finances that cannot be used for local animals in need.
Moreover, HB 278 allows removal of humane agents by the Probate Court without cause and removes the broad reporting requirement for child abuse cases.
HB 278 does have worthy attributes. It removes the residency requirement for humane agents. Thus, Ohio humane agents would be able to work outside of the county in which they reside. In addition, the county would raise the monthly pay for humane agents from $25 to $150.
Ohio needs animal law attorneys on the job for animal crimes. These special prosecutors have the knowledge, training, and expertise to facilitate a quick resolution to animal crime cases.
The swift prosecution of animal crimes by experienced, animal law attorneys is a necessary prong in Ohio’s defense against sinister, violent forces hard at work, hidden in plain sight, in our communities.
Read the bill in its entirety at the link above.
Read the analysis of HB 278 at the link above.